Wargames in military education & professional formation

The global military establishment is undergoing an unprecedented transformation in its modern history‭. ‬Contemporary warfare has‭ ‬moved beyond traditional paradigms into a complex operational environment defined by speed‭, ‬multidirectionality‭, ‬and pervasive uncertainty‭. ‬Military operations are now conducted simultaneously across land‭, ‬sea‭, ‬air‭, ‬space‭, ‬and cyberspace‭, ‬often under conditions of information overload‭, ‬ambiguity‭, ‬and overlapping threats‭. ‬

This shift has not only altered the character of warfare but has also compelled a fundamental rethinking of military knowledge itself‭, ‬the tools of professional military education‭, ‬and the process of developing officers capable of commanding forces in an environment where assumptions are unstable and rules of engagement are constantly evolving‭. ‬Within this context‭, ‬wargames—whose origins date back to the nineteenth century—have re-emerged not merely as a training technique‭, ‬but as a conceptual framework for shaping military thinking‭. ‬They have become an intellectual environment that enables the development of strategic and tactical reasoning‭, ‬strengthens decision-making under pressure‭, ‬and enhances the ability to understand and manage complex systems and operational paradoxes‭. ‬With advances in simulation sciences‭, ‬computing‭, ‬and artificial intelligence‭, ‬wargames have evolved into genuine cognitive laboratories‭, ‬allowing military institutions to test hypotheses‭, ‬anticipate future threats‭, ‬and experiment with tactics and doctrines before applying them in real-world operations‭.‬

Objectives of the Study

This study seeks to provide a comprehensive analytical framework for understanding the role of wargames in the professional formation of military personnel within modern armed forces‭. ‬It adopts a broad international perspective while drawing on the French‭ ‬experience as a representative case that illustrates the depth of institutional transformation taking place in this field‭. ‬The study examines the educational value of wargames‭, ‬their pedagogical characteristics‭, ‬their application across different military‭ ‬branches‭, ‬the structural challenges associated with their integration‭, ‬and their future development‭. ‬Ultimately‭, ‬it aims to assess the contribution of wargames to the emergence of a new military culture aligned with the operational demands of the twenty-first century‭.‬

Structural Transformation in Military Education and the Rise of Wargames

Throughout much of the twentieth century‭, ‬military institutions operated within a knowledge framework largely based on instruction‭, ‬lectures‭, ‬and the transmission of experience through a traditional‭ ‬“teacher–student”‭ ‬model‭. ‬While effective for conventional armies‭, ‬this approach is no longer sufficient to meet the demands of an era characterised by multi-domain operations‭, ‬accelerated decision cycles‭, ‬and fragmented certainties‭. ‬As a result‭, ‬many military education systems have been compelled to rethink their pedagogical foundations‭, ‬shifting from the mere transfer of knowledge towards cultivating the capacity for critical and adaptive thinking‭.‬

In the age of multi-domain operations‭, ‬the modern officer is expected to integrate cognitive abilities‭, ‬technical skills‭, ‬and practical experience‭. ‬Such competencies cannot be acquired through passive learning alone‭; ‬they require interactive experiences that allow learners to make mistakes‭, ‬analyse their consequences‭, ‬and reconstruct their understanding of operational situations‭. ‬Wargames provide precisely this form of experiential learning‭.‬

The French experience offers a clear illustration of this transformation‭. ‬Beginning in 2018‭, ‬the Ministry of the Armed Forces reoriented military curricula to position wargames as a core educational tool within military academies‭, ‬in parallel with similar‭ ‬initiatives undertaken by the United States‭, ‬the United Kingdom‭, ‬and Japan‭. ‬Wargames are no longer viewed as a supplementary training activity‭, ‬but as a central element in reshaping French military culture and embedding interactive thinking at the heart of‭ ‬officer development‭. ‬The establishment of specialised wargaming units within doctrine and concept development centres has further institutionalised this approach‭, ‬transforming wargames into a national programme that links initial education‭, ‬continuous training‭, ‬and doctrinal innovation‭. ‬This French shift reflects a broader international trend that seeks not simply to add new tools‭ ‬to military education‭, ‬but to redefine what it means to be an officer in contemporary armed forces‭.‬

Empirical experience has demonstrated that wargames enhance critical thinking‭, ‬reinforce collective analysis‭, ‬and foster initiative among officers and soldiers alike‭. ‬As operational environments grow increasingly complex and interconnected‭, ‬the adoption of‭ ‬wargames has become a strategic necessity rather than an educational luxury‭.‬

Pedagogical Foundations of Wargames and the Formation of Operational Thinking

Wargames are grounded in a sophisticated educational philosophy aimed at constructing what may be termed‭ ‬“instructional plausibility”‭: ‬an environment that closely resembles reality without falling into the trap of excessive realism‭. ‬Learning through wargaming requires a careful balance between representation and abstraction‭, ‬between reality and theoretical modelling‭. ‬While technical simulations seek to replicate reality in detail‭, ‬wargames focus on training the mind to manage essential variables without becoming‭ ‬distracted by secondary details‭.‬

The cognitive value of wargames rests on two fundamental pillars‭: ‬interaction and error‭. ‬Officers learn by engaging with a conflict environment governed by clear rules yet shaped by unstable variables‭, ‬and by testing their ability to make decisions under time pressure and incomplete information‭. ‬More importantly‭, ‬learning is deepened through error‭. ‬In wargaming‭, ‬mistakes are not failures but gateways to understanding‭. ‬This is where the importance of the post-game evaluation session becomes evident‭, ‬as it transforms gameplay from an engaging activity into a structured learning experience‭. ‬During this phase‭, ‬facilitators help participants uncover unconscious decision patterns and convert operational intuition into explicit‭, ‬transferable knowledge‭.‬

The role of the facilitator is central to this process‭. ‬Rather than directing the game from within or imposing decisions on participants‭, ‬the facilitator ensures alignment with educational objectives‭, ‬maintains an appropriate level of complexity‭, ‬and structures spontaneous discussions into coherent analytical insights‭. ‬This role requires both operational experience and strong analytical skills‭, ‬enabling the effective management of what can be described as an‭ ‬“operational dialogue”‭ ‬within the game‭. ‬Wargames do not merely generate knowledge‭; ‬they cultivate a distinct mode of thinking‭. ‬They train officers to‭ ‬operate amid uncertainty‭, ‬to make decisions despite contradictory information‭, ‬to adapt when plans collapse unexpectedly‭, ‬and to‭ ‬identify weak signals in noisy and disrupted environments‭. ‬These cognitive abilities form the essence of modern operational thinking and are difficult to acquire quickly or effectively through traditional educational methods‭. ‬Ultimately‭, ‬the educational and training value of wargames lies in their ability to create an interactive learning environment in which officers and soldiers‭ ‬confront complexity progressively and test their operational intuition within a risk-free framework‭. ‬Gameplay itself is not the‭ ‬objective‭; ‬rather‭, ‬it is a means of embedding strategic thinking and refining decision-making skills‭. ‬This underscores the importance of adaptable scenario design‭, ‬effective management of human interaction‭, ‬and the systematic transformation of intuitive experience into structured knowledge‭.‬

Applications of Wargames Across Military Branches

One of the defining strengths of wargames lies in their exceptional flexibility‭, ‬which allows them to be adapted to the specific‭ ‬characteristics and operational requirements of each military branch‭. ‬International experience demonstrates that every domain has found in wargames an effective tool for developing particular skill sets among its officers‭.‬

In land forces‭, ‬wargames are widely used to enhance tactical and logistical thinking‭, ‬as well as manoeuvre management‭. ‬Ground combat is inherently complex and rapidly evolving‭, ‬and its operational paradoxes can rarely be fully grasped through theoretical instruction alone‭. ‬Interactive environments that allow officers to test tactical decisions are therefore essential‭. ‬The French‭ ‬“LOGOPS”‭ ‬model represents a notable example in this regard‭, ‬offering a logistical wargame that confronts officers with critical decisions related to resource allocation and supply shortages‭. ‬Through such models‭, ‬learners gain a deeper understanding of theoretical‭ ‬principles that are often difficult to internalise in a classroom setting‭. ‬In the air and space domains‭, ‬wargames have enabled the management of highly complex scenarios involving air superiority‭, ‬mission planning‭, ‬and multi-layered threats‭. ‬The‭ ‬“Overlord Crisis”‭ ‬wargame illustrates this approach by placing participants in an environment where they must conduct multi-level air operations‭ ‬and command diverse units within a collective operational framework‭. ‬In some French institutions‭, ‬students are even involved in‭ ‬the design of the wargame itself‭, ‬allowing them to understand not only the outcomes of airpower decisions but also the internal‭ ‬logic that shapes them‭.‬

Naval operations have similarly benefited from wargaming‭, ‬particularly in representing the long-range and endurance-based nature‭ ‬of maritime warfare‭. ‬Naval commanders are often required to make decisive choices under conditions of limited information and within geographically complex environments‭. ‬Wargames inspired by scenarios from the Falklands War have proven effective in training officers to manage the‭ ‬“fog of naval war”‭ ‬and to understand the persistent tension between information isolation and the need for coordination in fleet operations‭. ‬Military medical services constitute another domain that has derived significant value from wargames‭. ‬The management of mass casualties‭, ‬allocation of scarce resources‭, ‬organisation of evacuation chains‭, ‬and response to unexpected developments can all be simulated through medical wargames such as‭ ‬“JESSA”‭. ‬These have demonstrated their effectiveness in training medical personnel to make sound decisions in high-stress environments‭.‬

Internal security forces have also benefited from wargaming applications‭, ‬particularly in recreating scenarios of civil unrest‭, ‬collective violence‭, ‬and crisis management‭. ‬This approach provides a safe environment for testing intervention strategies‭, ‬assessing leadership readiness‭, ‬and identifying operational shortcomings before they manifest in real-world situations‭.‬

Overall‭, ‬the success of wargames across different branches is closely linked to their ability to reflect the specific characteristics of each domain‭. ‬This is evident‭, ‬for example‭, ‬in their use within French air force training‭, ‬where pedagogical innovation‭ ‬has transformed wargames into an integral part of a structured educational system‭. ‬These programmes incorporate historical‭, ‬political‭, ‬and operational dimensions‭, ‬enabling the accumulation of specialised expertise and supporting a multi-scenario approach that enhances learner autonomy and critical thinking‭.‬

The Strategic Dimension of Wargames in Doctrinal Development

The cognitive applications of wargames extend beyond individual training to encompass the development of military doctrine itself‭. ‬Modern armed forces increasingly employ wargames as tools for future foresight‭, ‬analysis of complex military systems‭, ‬evaluation of emerging technologies‭, ‬and identification of strengths and weaknesses within plans and institutions‭.‬

Over the past two decades‭, ‬the United States and the United Kingdom have made extensive use of wargames to analyse potential confrontations with peer competitors and to assess scenarios in regions such as the Indo-Pacific and Eastern Europe‭. ‬Conversely‭, ‬several Asian and Middle Eastern states have relied on wargames to develop cyber defence strategies and to evaluate scenarios involving drone attacks or irregular threat networks‭.‬

The integration of artificial intelligence into wargames represents a major leap forward in this field‭. ‬Contemporary wargames are no longer static models‭; ‬they have evolved into dynamic environments that respond to player decisions‭, ‬generate alternative courses of action‭, ‬and simulate adversary behaviour through advanced algorithms‭. ‬This development enables armed forces to test their plans against virtual opponents capable of formulating counter-strategies‭, ‬thereby significantly enhancing anticipatory and risk-assessment capabilities‭.‬

In this context‭, ‬wargames have become a central instrument in doctrinal development due to their ability to stimulate collective‭ ‬debate on strategic options‭, ‬decision impacts‭, ‬and the interaction of multiple operational dimensions‭. ‬They are not merely training tools‭, ‬but research instruments that allow military institutions to test hypotheses and compare alternative courses of action in environments that closely approximate reality‭. ‬The realistic scenarios they offer contribute to the establishment of a shared analytical culture among officers‭, ‬facilitating the development of concepts suited to joint operations and enabling a deeper‭ ‬understanding of emerging challenges in multi-domain environments‭.‬

Challenges of Integrating Wargames into Military Education

Despite their considerable added value‭, ‬integrating wargames into military education is not without challenges‭. ‬Many armed forces face shortages of specialised personnel‭, ‬a lack of unified national frameworks for wargaming‭, ‬and an overreliance on individual initiatives that lack long-term sustainability‭. ‬Some institutions also encounter the problem of‭ ‬“negative learning‭, ‬whereby poorly designed or contextually inappropriate wargames instil inaccurate operational habits or misconceptions‭.‬

Moreover‭, ‬the ability of different military branches to adopt wargames varies according to prior experience‭, ‬technological capacity‭, ‬and mission profiles‭. ‬This underscores the need for a coherent institutional structure that embeds wargames within the military education system‭, ‬rather than treating them as supplementary tools‭. ‬The French experience has shown that the existence of a‭ ‬central wargaming unit‭, ‬combined with close cooperation between military schools and think tanks‭, ‬can generate a new dynamic in‭ ‬professional military formation—provided that an organisational framework is established to support game development‭, ‬supply technical and educational expertise‭, ‬and standardise practices across branches‭.‬

The Future of Wargames in an Era of Technological Transformation and Artificial Intelligence

Wargaming is entering a new phase of development driven by emerging technologies‭. ‬Virtual reality‭, ‬augmented reality‭, ‬three-dimensional simulation‭, ‬and artificial intelligence will significantly enhance the ability of wargames to represent operational environments and to analyse officer performance in real time‭. ‬Wargames are set to evolve from training tools into‭ ‬“intelligent instructors”‭ ‬capable of adapting to player proficiency‭, ‬proposing additional scenarios‭, ‬and identifying individual weaknesses‭.‬

These advancements will also enable the creation of personalised learning pathways for each officer based on performance data and leadership characteristics‭. ‬Wargames will thus become part of an integrated system encompassing training‭, ‬assessment‭, ‬professional development‭, ‬and operational requalification‭. ‬This evolution reflects the broader shift towards the concept of the‭ ‬“smart army‭, ‬which relies on data utilisation and continuous analysis to support decision-making and enhance readiness‭.‬

Ultimately‭, ‬the future of wargames will depend on their ability to integrate deeply into the strategic architecture of armed forces‭, ‬moving beyond their traditional role as training instruments to become pillars of operational analysis and decision-making‭.‬‭ ‬The field is expected to expand in line with the logic of multi-domain operations‭, ‬requiring simulation models capable of representing complex interactions across land‭, ‬sea‭, ‬air‭, ‬space‭, ‬and cyberspace simultaneously‭. ‬Achieving this will require sustained‭ ‬institutional support‭, ‬advanced expertise in design and evaluation‭, ‬and the development of shared platforms across military branches to ensure readiness for increasingly rapid and interconnected future challenges‭.‬

Conclusion

Wargames have become one of the most important pathways through which leading armed forces around the world cultivate strategic‭ ‬mindsets among their commanders‭, ‬officers‭, ‬and soldiers‭. ‬What was once a form of simulation has evolved into a comprehensive educational philosophy‭, ‬and what began as a training technique has become a tool for re-engineering military knowledge itself‭. ‬In an increasingly complex world‭, ‬reliance on theoretical instruction alone is no longer viable‭. ‬The modern commander must be able to experiment‭, ‬reassess‭, ‬and reconstruct operational understanding through practice‭.‬

Global experience—including the French case—demonstrates that wargames are not simply educational aids‭, ‬but strategic laboratories‭, ‬arenas for cost-free error‭, ‬and platforms for redefining military decision-making‭. ‬Investment in this field is not a luxury‭, ‬but a necessity for developing a new generation of officers and soldiers equipped with cognitive flexibility‭, ‬complex thinking skills‭, ‬and readiness for the conflicts of the twenty-first century—achieved at lower cost and through one of the fastest and most effective available means‭.‬

By‭: ‬Professor Wael Saleh
‭(‬Expert at TRENDS Research and Advisory‭)‬

Instagram
WhatsApp
Al Jundi

Please use portrait mode to get the best view.